By Interaction Team
Israel has secured a favored position within the United States foreign policy framework, drawing on various strategic considerations. President Biden, in particular, has exhibited a fervent commitment to ensuring Israel’s interests protection, extending wide-ranging military, diplomatic, and financial assistance.
This allegiance, however, has led to an apparent disregard for the distressing brutality and cold-blooded war crimes committed by Israel, which have resulted in the tragic loss of thousands of innocent lives in hospitals, schools, and other civilian areas. Despite the apparent violation of humanitarian principles and international law, America’s unconditional backing of Israel remains resolute.
A striking instance of this insistent and biased support was witnessed when the United States vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza, amid relentless violence. President Biden’s visit to Israel coincided with an attack on a hospital that engulfed the lives of around 800 Palestinians, igniting reflective concerns about America’s approach to the Palestinian issue. The ongoing situation suggests the emergence of what appears to be an unyielding pursuit of interests, akin to a modern-day crusade, possibly leading to a planned genocide in Palestine.
Examining Hamas’s preparations and attacks reveals a web of global connections, notably with Iran, Russia, and possibly China. Iran’s role in supporting Hamas is both evident and strategic, driven by its longstanding opposition to Israel and its consistent efforts to expand its influence throughout the Middle East. This support aligns with Iran’s broader regional goals.
Meanwhile, Russia has a vested interest in diverting American and Western attention away from both Ukraine and Israel, thereby reducing pressure in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. Russia’s historical alliance with Iran against the United States further strengthens its ties in this context.
China, yet more unnoticeable in its involvement, seems to desire that America be occupied elsewhere, away from the Indo-Pacific region. In this way, American engagement in the Middle East will get increased but, in turn, China will have some relief and potential obstacles to the success of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) will be minimized.
In all these scenarios, America’s unwavering support for Israel remains driven by a mix of strategic concerns and economic interests. If Hamas successfully pushes back Israel, America’s ability to influence the outcome will be severely limited. Furthermore, any significant challenge to the petrodollar, which the United States deems essential for its national interests, could jeopardize its standing on the global stage. This would create a vacuum that powers like China and Russia are poised to fill, potentially shifting the global balance of power.
India’s stance in the present situation remains enigmatic. The cunning ‘baniya’ is skillfully leveraging its substantial market potential, driven by its massive population on both fronts at the same time. India is simultaneously nurturing its connections with Russia and Iran while shrewdly bolstering its strategic and economic partnerships with the United States and Israel. However, it’s foreseeable that this diplomatic balancing act may not be sustainable in the long run once regional tensions find resolution.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia and most Gulf countries express reluctance towards this scenario. They prioritize the swift resolution of the issue and the protection of Palestinian interests. However, their apprehension stems from Iran and Hizbullah’s involvement with Hamas and their increasing influence in the Middle East. Though these nations are busy vigorously in diplomatic efforts, they have been less active when it comes to providing direct physical support on the ground.
The ongoing conflict has cast a harsh light on Israel, the United States, and the West. Their fearsome arsenals, advanced missile defense systems, and claims of championing human rights have been exposed, challenging their moral and ethical authority. One significant casualty in this crisis is America’s promotion of the ‘Deen e Barahim’ religion, which was intended to be an inclusive faith accommodating Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
This vision, reminiscent of Emperor Akbar’s “Deen e Ilahi” or “Deen e Akbari,” has met a disgraceful end, much like its historical counterpart. As the conflict intensifies, it is increasingly apparent that its repercussions are two-fold. On one hand, the escalating situation is proving to be catastrophic for the Palestinian population, resulting in thousands of deaths and colossal suffering. On the other hand, it is poised to considerably impact America’s standing in global politics and international relations.